Modern Ukrainian parents are increasingly thinking about whether to leave their child in a classical communal school or transfer them to a private institution. There are many myths and stereotypes surrounding both formats that hinder an objective assessment. As part of the “What’s Up with Education” project, Ukrainian language and literature teacher at Piskivskyi Lyceum “Leader” Maria Labek and IT teacher at the “Mingart” educational territory Oleksandr Dumyshenets compared their own experience of working in both sectors. A detailed analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each system will help understand which environment will be optimal for your child.
Economics of Education and Real Motivation of Teachers
The main stereotype surrounding private education is that parents simply buy grades and create greenhouse conditions for their children. Oleksandr Dumyshenets refutes this statement, noting that the financial component only increases responsibility. Parents who pay for their child’s education independently put forward strict demands for the quality of knowledge and safety, which forces the administration to carefully select staff and control results. A private institution offers a modern material base, technological equipment, and a comfortable space.
“Parents who pay money, they demand more, and that’s logical. They want to see what they’re paying for. So, the quality control of education in private schools is extremely high,” — emphasizes Oleksandr Dumyshenets.
Communal schools are often criticized for low teacher salaries, assuming that there are no strong professionals left. Maria Labek emphasizes that the financial factor is not decisive for professionalism. Many strong teachers deliberately stay in public lyceums, perceiving teaching as a mission. A communal school offers fundamental systematicity and scalability, but the teacher is more tightly bound by the framework of paper reporting, which takes away time from direct communication with students.
“Money is not always the main motivator for a teacher. In communal schools, there are a huge number of incredible professionals who stay there because of their love for their work and dedication to children,” — notes Maria Labek.
Speed of Changes and Limits of Internal Freedom
The key advantage of a private format is its enormous flexibility and lack of bureaucratic pressure. Any educational initiative, a new elective, or a change in approach to a lesson is implemented instantly. In the state system, similar processes require lengthy approvals and program approvals. Students of private schools grow up uninhibited, bold in expressing their opinions, and free in communicating with adults on an equal footing. However, such freedom has a downside: sometimes teenagers confuse it with permissiveness, demonstrating disregard for discipline.
“In a private school, we can implement an idea in one day. There is no long bureaucratic procedure of approvals, which often kills motivation in the communal sector,” — shares his experience Oleksandr Dumyshenets.
Communal institutions win in terms of forming social connections due to their scale. Large school-wide events, internal competitions, and deep traditions create a strong sense of community. At the same time, the microclimate and level of knowledge in a public school critically depend on the presence of competitive selection. Specialized lyceums, where children are admitted based on exams, demonstrate high motivation. In regular classes without selection, teachers more often face passivity from teenagers.
“A communal school is about large-scale socialization. School-wide events, traditions, this big student ‘movement’ — this is what children really need and what forms their best memories,” — believes Maria Labek.
Also read:
Podcast "What's Up with Education". Why psychological support for families of children with disabilities becomes key
Tripartite Partnership vs. Life Tempering
The organization of communication with parents in different sectors differs radically. Private institutions have completely abandoned the Soviet format of parent-teacher meetings, replacing them with individual tripartite meetings in the format of “teacher — parents — child”. In addition, the administration creates special care departments that take on the resolution of conflicts, protecting the teacher from emotional burnout. It is essential to say that this is the experience of a specific teacher in a specific educational institution.
In a communal school, the entire burden of communication with parents is borne by the class teacher. There are no protective barriers, but a public institution gives a child a more realistic and harsh encounter with the world. Students are forced to independently earn their authority, and conflict resolution occurs without constant hyper-supervision, which becomes an advantage when transitioning to independent adult life.
Guidelines for Parental Choice
There is no universal answer to the question of which school is better, as the choice depends on the child’s psychotype and the family’s requests.
A private school is worth choosing if a child needs an individual approach, gentle adaptation, a modern technological environment, and the development of creativity without strict frameworks. This is a space for the formation of leadership qualities in a safe, psychologically comfortable environment.
A public school will suit children with a high level of self-organization, who value healthy competition and a large social environment. A communal lyceum, especially with competitive selection, will be an excellent solution for those who need a strong academic base, clear discipline, and tempering of character for real life.
Also read:
Features of the 2026 admission campaign and the main pitfalls of the new assessment format
